Week 6 - Presentation feed back

Clarity of the oral presentation:

The outline of the topic was very clear, it shows that each individual of the group has done a good amount of research.

The division of the topic was made nicely. Intention of what they want to say was clearly shown verbally.

Clarity of the written presentation:

Good titling of  each slide and each point highlighted very well so that it was easy for the audience to understand. 

Power Point was graphically clean, especially it was written in dot points and interesting layout.  

Distinctiveness  and specificity of examples:

It was showing that they had organized their work flow according to what they learned from the research of planning.

There was an intention of the quality in planning and the management of the project. It is a good way to refer to other team member’s tasks and efforts. This made the presentation clearer.

Referencing: 

Referencing was mentioned during the feedback discussion. Maybe this can be improved by labelling each image in the slides.

The conceptual context:

There was a strong connection between the topic, which was planning and their own project, so they showed that they understood that concept of their research and the theme.

The still images:

It could have been easier if there was less text on the slides, but the idea was delivered clearly so it was an aspect of the oral presentation as a whole.  I guess it is a result of the well prepared and managed presentation.